Higher Plasma Densities, More Efficient Tokamaks

In magnetic confinement fusion devices known as tokamaks, the maximum operational density limits the efficiency and now we know how this limit may be overcome.

The left figure shows a large, asymmetric magnetic island, which bulges on the inside (that is, the blue arrow is longer than the red), that can lead to a disruption and end a plasma discharge. The right figure shows the empirical scaling law of the density limit derived from experimental observations compared to the theoretical prediction, where the different symbols indicate different parameter assumptions (for example, different impurity concentrations). For all parameters, the predicted density limit agrees almost perfectly with the experimental scaling; that is ¯ne ≈¯nG

The Science

When the density of the hot, ionized gas (known as a plasma) in a tokamak exceeds a certain limit, it usually leads to a rapid loss of heat and plasma currents. The currents are required to confine the plasma. Such events can seriously damage the tokamak. Before the disruption, scientists often observe large magnetic islands. Magnetic islands are thermally isolated, small “bubbles” of plasma. Recent investigations confirmed that scientists could use these islands to correctly predict the density limit. The team showed that when the island becomes large enough, the hot plasma core mixes with the cool plasma and causes the disruption. They can use this information to control the disruptions.

The Impact

The density limit in tokamaks has been an experimental obstacle for decades. It’s crucial to understand the density limit. Why? Because in fusion power produced by tokamaks, the higher the plasma density grows the more power is produced. This work correctly explains the density limit. This has led to suggestions that the density limit can be exceeded by carefully heating the magnetic island using external heating sources or by reducing the impurity density.

Summary

In this work, the classical expression for the growth of a magnetic island’s size is extended to include the effect of island asymmetry (shown in the figure) and the effect of thermal perturbations inside the island. These corrections are crucial for understanding the dynamics of magnetic island growth and therefore disruptions.

Not only does the island change with time, so does the background plasma equilibrium. This effect must be taken into account to get an accurate, self-consistent solution. An internal inductance model is used to calculate the equilibrium evolution with increasing plasma density, and the impurity radiation is calculated with corona equilibrium cooling rates.

The increased density limit predicted by the new model agrees almost perfectly, as shown in the figure (right), with the scaling laws derived from an experimental database of disruptions for the world’s most important tokamaks. When the plasma density is increased, the plasma currents shrink, and so the heating is reduced. The impurity radiation, on the other hand, is proportional to the square of plasma density; so, as the density doubles, the cooling quadruples.

The magnetic island will grow when the “cooling” power flowing out of the island exceeds the “heating” power flowing in. The heating comes from the small-but-significant electrical resistance to plasma currents. The cooling comes from radiation emitted by impurities in the magnetic island.

Contact

Qian Teng
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
[email protected], (609) 243-2660

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences.

Publications

Q. Teng, D.P. Brennan, L. Delgado-Aparicio, D.A. Gates, J. Swerdlow, and R.B. White,A predictive model for the tokamak density limit.” Nuclear Fusion 56, 106001 (2016). [DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/56/10/106001]

D.A. Gates and L. Delgado-Aparicio, “Origin of tokamak density limit scalings.” Physical Review Letters 108, 165004 (2012). [DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.165004]

R.B. White, D.A. Gates, and D.P. Brennan, “Thermal island destabilization and the Greenwald limit.” Physics of Plasmas 22, 022514 (2015). [DOI: 10.1063/1.4913433]

Highlight Categories

Program: FES

Performer: DOE Laboratory